gcc - Make c++ macro2 containt quoted body of macro1 -


i'm trying make kind of simple system calculates number of builds, including info in .rc file (for windows) , met problem. here is:

#define quote(s) #s #define       0,0,0,1 #define a_str   quote(a)

expanding of a_str: "a" not "0,0,0,1" expected.

well, need a_str string representation of a (that's windres expects see in .rc file), can't find way this.

i've tried smth #define a_str #a expands #0,0,0,1.

i tried using qmake this: defines *= a_str="<here-is-how-i-get-version>" gcc gets without quotes , i've got same problem.

when c preprocessor macro expanded, parameters expanded literal arguments, s expanded a when quote(s) taking argument a expanded. normally, after expansion complete, expanded text scanned again expand macros embedded therein, cause a expand 0,0,0,1. however, when stringification operator # used stringify following text, stringification happens first, following text never gets chance expanded, stringified "a" final expansion of a_str.

this problem solved introducing second level of indirection, gives initial macro argument second chance expand:

#define quote2(a) #a #define quote(a) quote2(a)

however, not work case, because in first-level expansion a expand 0,0,0,1, taken 4 arguments quote2(), , rejected invalid macro call.

you can solve variadic macro arguments , __va_args__:

#define quote2(...) #__va_args__ #define quote(...) quote2(__va_args__)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - Validate object ID from GET to POST -

i have method allows user access comment have made on site. have post method lets them update comment. my normal solution send entire comment model through, let them update it, update on database when post back. involve sending commentid through in hiddenfor , can manipulated. how can verify commentid sent in get method same i'm getting in post , not able alter comment wish? how can verify commentid sent in method same i'm getting in post? basically have validate following things in post - user logged-in user. authenticated users post comments. commentid in post , should valid commentid , should present in database. userid associated logged-in user should same userid associated comment . comment should contain userid column, can check @ time of update. to make sure update happens comment has been sent in get - hold commentid in session , in post action compare commentid value in session .
Read more

node.js - Custom Model Validator SailsJS -

when using custom model validator checks record within model. return within spread doesn't seem end control flow. //post.js model /** * custom validator **/ types: { isuservalid: function(user_id) { var promise = require('bluebird'); promise.all([ user.findone({id: user_id}) ]) .spread(function(user) { console.log(user); if (user === null || user === undefined) { console.log('failed'); return false; }else{ console.log('passed'); return true; } }); } }, my response standard validation failed response. { "error": "e_validation", "status": 400, "summary": "1 attribute invalid", "model": "post", "invalidattributes": { "owner": [ { "rule": "isuservalid", ...
Read more

php - Find a regex to take part of Email -

i have following emails need extract part from: bestellnummer xxx: 1 von xxx, 1er pack ------------- anfang der nachricht ------------- foo bar baz foo bar baz // <<<<< need text here ------------- ende der nachricht ------------- ------------- anfang der nachricht ------------- foo bar baz foo bar baz ------------- ende der nachricht ------------- there 0 unlimited occurences of ------------- anfang der nachricht ------------- ------------- ende der nachricht ------------- and i'm able extract first part regex: $re = "/------------- .*? -------------.?(.*?).?------------- .*? -------------/s"; but, i'm quite new on learning regex, i'm pretty sure there must better regex extract part (foo bar baz foo bar baz) of text between ------------- anfang der nachricht ------------- ------------- ende der nachricht ------------- as can in different languages, i'm using .? to match between hyphens. i...
Read more